Our methodology
We separate capabilities, evidence and commercial interests. A product or plan is assessed only against the criteria of its category.
Weighted evidence coverage
The model weights core capabilities at 45%, integrations at 20%, local suitability at 20% and AI at 15%. Documented support earns 1, partial support 0.5, and documented absence 0. Unknowns widen the score interval. A final score requires at least 80% weighted evidence, confirmed local eligibility, editorial review and resolution of remaining score uncertainty.
Next research steps
This first edition covers 4 categories: Accounting, Invoicing, Recruiting & applicant tracking, Document Management. 14 product dossiers and 36 plan assessments; other categories remain in research.
These assessments use dated supplier documentation, not hands-on testing. Local applicability and plan entitlements are evaluated separately.